It's pretty funny how things you hate the most usually being the thing that you end up paying attention the most. Like my experience with the animal law, the more subject I object, the more productive I write about that matter - even in fact those writings might be rebuttal.
We had an interesting simulation in one of the class: Dog for Livestock Bill debate simulation. Yes, what I mean by simulation was a FAKE bill, fake opponents and sure, fake proponents. I was acting as one of the proponents of this bill, specifically, my role was a dog meat consumer, and during our work we collected some interesting materials. I summed that up in a 5 minutes speech which I'll just post in here, but I recommend you to read some more interesting articles in here. Anyway, here is the fake bill:
And, here is my *evil* but *rationale* speech! ENJOY!
DISCLAIMER: Please bring in mind that this is an argument for a simulation. It does not represent my personal opinion about eating dog meats, and even I do LOVE dog meats, I eliminate health concerns in here since my role (which is fake) was to advocate the bill. Consuming dog meats in the US is highly related to the vaccines and medications received by the dogs, and very possibly unsafe for human consumption.
Let me begin this with one question: What is the most delicious meat that you ever taste? Pork? Beef? Chicken? Turkey? Lamb?
Dog meats are exotic delicacy. And it is exactly the central reason why legalizing abandoned dogs as livestock can be a promising solution of our overarching problem with dogs overpopulation, dogs euthanasia and disposal of euthanized dogs.
There are three reasons why we believe this law is important for Otagon society as a whole, and dog meat consumers in particular: (1) We have enormous problems related to abandoned dogs and their euthanasia, which require an innovative solution; (2) There is an increasing consumer demands over dog meats in Otagon, making dog meats business a promising market – and a solution; (3) The scheme offered in this bill will force dog meats market to ensure dog welfare and hygienic practice.
But before proceeding further, I need to ensure that everyone in here departs from the same page to see the practice of eating dogs with rational, rather than emotional, considerations. Looking at this issue, we tend to react emotionally from our cultural bias. But let us think about this: Is it acceptable for Moslems or Jewish folks pointing their finger to us and saying that we are immoral because we eat pork? And is it justified for Indians to believe that everyone who eat beef is less civilized than them? Then do we really have strong reason, aside from our own cultural bias, to put a social prejudice upon people who is performing his personal dietary choice? This country, since our Declaration of Independence, has put a solid foundation and eventually succeeded in building a society who respects personal choices.
Some other interesting sources:
We had an interesting simulation in one of the class: Dog for Livestock Bill debate simulation. Yes, what I mean by simulation was a FAKE bill, fake opponents and sure, fake proponents. I was acting as one of the proponents of this bill, specifically, my role was a dog meat consumer, and during our work we collected some interesting materials. I summed that up in a 5 minutes speech which I'll just post in here, but I recommend you to read some more interesting articles in here. Anyway, here is the fake bill:
And, here is my *evil* but *rationale* speech! ENJOY!
DISCLAIMER: Please bring in mind that this is an argument for a simulation. It does not represent my personal opinion about eating dog meats, and even I do LOVE dog meats, I eliminate health concerns in here since my role (which is fake) was to advocate the bill. Consuming dog meats in the US is highly related to the vaccines and medications received by the dogs, and very possibly unsafe for human consumption.
Let me begin this with one question: What is the most delicious meat that you ever taste? Pork? Beef? Chicken? Turkey? Lamb?
What about meat that is as fatty as pork that it has a
little taste of bacon; juicy as beef but inherit the same unique texture as
lamb, and capable of warming up your body like wine?
“After eating dog meats, beef seems tasteless” – Mark Wiens,
a famous food blogger confessed. What he said has repeatedly been spoken by many
people who dared to step outside of their culinary comfort zone and eat dogs.Source: toughtcatalog.com (2013) |
Dog meats are exotic delicacy. And it is exactly the central reason why legalizing abandoned dogs as livestock can be a promising solution of our overarching problem with dogs overpopulation, dogs euthanasia and disposal of euthanized dogs.
There are three reasons why we believe this law is important for Otagon society as a whole, and dog meat consumers in particular: (1) We have enormous problems related to abandoned dogs and their euthanasia, which require an innovative solution; (2) There is an increasing consumer demands over dog meats in Otagon, making dog meats business a promising market – and a solution; (3) The scheme offered in this bill will force dog meats market to ensure dog welfare and hygienic practice.
But before proceeding further, I need to ensure that everyone in here departs from the same page to see the practice of eating dogs with rational, rather than emotional, considerations. Looking at this issue, we tend to react emotionally from our cultural bias. But let us think about this: Is it acceptable for Moslems or Jewish folks pointing their finger to us and saying that we are immoral because we eat pork? And is it justified for Indians to believe that everyone who eat beef is less civilized than them? Then do we really have strong reason, aside from our own cultural bias, to put a social prejudice upon people who is performing his personal dietary choice? This country, since our Declaration of Independence, has put a solid foundation and eventually succeeded in building a society who respects personal choices.
And yet, as a dog-loving society, we have successfully
abandoned 6 millions of dogs and sent them to animal shelter; and eventually
killed 3-4 millions of them with a method we call humane. It happens every
single year. Department of Agriculture’s data shows that even organizations
like PETA has euthanized more than 95% of the animals it rescued. And about 2
billion dollars of public money are being spent every year to maintain the
shelter operations, the euthanasia, and the disposal of our dear friends’ dead
bodies. The disposal itself also troubles the ecology and poses an
environmental justice problem to the low-income community. Our problem is not
resolved – it evolved.
Ladies and gentlemen, as I mentioned in my second point, the
creative solution that we’re looking for is always there. The market demand is
growing. Dog meats are considered delicacy in many parts of the world,
including China, Philippines, Vietnam, South Korea, some parts of Africa, even
in Canada, and the list goes on. Top 5 countries of origin of the 17.3 millions
of Asian Americans are actually dog-eating countries; and some of these folks
brought their dietary culture with them, even influencing Americans to also try
this delicacy. Overbrook, a town in Kansas, has been hosting more than 21
annual dog-eating festivals, a perfect example of American-Vietnam
acculturation in terms of culinary preferences. As this bill is debated, at
least one point of contact of every municipality in Otagon has let me know
their support.
But as I mentioned in my third point, the current situation
of the emerging dog meat market is terrible – both for the dogs and for the
consumers. We might not know – but it’s there. Just like Philadelphia case,
Otagon dog butchers using the available legal loophole, behind their closed
doors – breeding, raising, and slaughtering dogs. It’s legal to do so, without
any standards available, without any provisions to prosecute, without any
inspections. I’ve been observing for 15 years how the sanitary standard is
lacking, and how the traditional method of killing the dog is far behind our
standard of ‘humane’. By having no inspected processor, the consumers lack
certainty and information of safety level of the dog meat, posing themselves
with the risk of trichinellosis or excessive level of chemicals within the
dog’s flesh. By having no inspected processor, we let more dogs beaten to death
under the silence of the law. The most suitable answer for this is law and
regulation.
“Life’s most persistent and urgent question is ‘What are you
doing for others?’ - Martin Luther King, Jr. said. We, the dog meat consumers,
are offering to voluntarily bear the social stigma of eating dog meats so that
it can compensate society’s burden caused by America’s excessive abandonment of
our lovely friends. Think about it”Some other interesting sources:
No comments:
Post a Comment